ASSESSMENT CE SERIES: Feedback in psychological assessment
$10.00
Presenters:
Emily Gottfried PhD Medical University of South Carolina, Assessment Section President Elect
Hadas Pade PsyD California School of Professional Psychology SF Bay Assessment Section President
Brief Description:
The provision of assessment feedback should be considered in every assessment case. Not only is assessment feedback recommended in the APA Ethics Code (standard 9.10: Explaining assessment results; APA, 2017), the Standards (AERA, APA, & NCME, 2014), and noted as a primary area of competency in assessment training by the APA (2020), research has shown that it can have a significant, positive impact on therapeutic outcomes (e.g., Ackerman et al., 2000; Allen et al., 2003; Poston & Hanson, 2010). This session will briefly review the core components of in-person feedback sessions and written reports, including person focused contextually integrated findings in reader friendly language to address assessment goals and questions in clinical settings (Chapman-Hillard, et. al 2018; Wright, 2020). Common challenges in feedback as well as general recommendations towards effective feedback will be discussed.
Learning Objectives:
At the end of the webinar, participants will be able to:
1. Identify the core components for providing effective feedback.
2. List strategies recommended for meaningful written reports.
3. Discuss the importance of client context in feedback across clinical settings.
Description
Presenters:
Emily Gottfried PhD Medical University of South Carolina, Assessment Section President Elect
Hadas Pade PsyD California School of Professional Psychology SF Bay Assessment Section President
Brief Description:
The provision of assessment feedback should be considered in every assessment case. Not only is assessment feedback recommended in the APA Ethics Code (standard 9.10: Explaining assessment results; APA, 2017), the Standards (AERA, APA, & NCME, 2014), and noted as a primary area of competency in assessment training by the APA (2020), research has shown that it can have a significant, positive impact on therapeutic outcomes (e.g., Ackerman et al., 2000; Allen et al., 2003; Poston & Hanson, 2010). This session will briefly review the core components of in-person feedback sessions and written reports, including person focused contextually integrated findings in reader friendly language to address assessment goals and questions in clinical settings (Chapman-Hillard, et. al 2018; Wright, 2020). Common challenges in feedback as well as general recommendations towards effective feedback will be discussed.
Learning Objectives:
At the end of the webinar, participants will be able to:
1. Identify the core components for providing effective feedback.
2. List strategies recommended for meaningful written reports.
3. Discuss the importance of client context in feedback across clinical settings.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.